{"id":29365,"date":"2018-09-26T10:22:17","date_gmt":"2018-09-26T08:22:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.laragon.es\/ehs-management-centralize-or-decentralize\/"},"modified":"2022-09-13T19:44:49","modified_gmt":"2022-09-13T17:44:49","slug":"ehs-management-centralize-or-decentralize","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.laragon.es\/en\/ehs-management-centralize-or-decentralize\/","title":{"rendered":"EHS MANAGEMENT: CENTRALIZE OR DECENTRALIZE?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: Enablon Insights<\/a>. Translated by Laragon<\/a>.<\/p>\n

For organizations that participate in a selection process for the selection of EHS software<\/span><\/a>While there is no doubt that a software system will help improve EHS management, it must also take into account personnel, processes, organizational culture and other aspects that influence performance.<\/p>\n

Organizations should establish their EHS objectives before implementing an EHS software system. An important question you need to ask yourselves is the following:<\/p>\n

“Should there be a centralized or decentralized approach to EHS management?”<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Every industry is different and every organization is unique, so the answer to the question will vary. But here’s an answer that will probably apply to most global organizations: A balance is needed between centralization and decentralization. Going fully in one direction or the other is not ideal because there will be situations that will require some decentralization.<\/p>\n

To illustrate the need for a balance between centralization and decentralization, let’s look at four examples for each approach.<\/p>\n

Examples where centralization helps<\/h2>\n